Compare vendors · 4 pages

Warehouse vendor comparison worksheet

Compare vendors using the same must-have requirements, proof, full cost, support needs, and limitations.

Fill it in online · Print or save as PDF · Your entries are not uploadedNot sure about a term? Open the plain-English glossary
How to use this worksheet
  1. Fill it out with workers who do the job.
  2. Use actual observations or system records.
  3. If an answer is uncertain, write what still needs to be checked.

Your answers stay only in this open page. Print or save a PDF before closing or reloading it.

Use this when

Shortlisting warehouse workflow or execution technologies.

See a filled-example scenario

Requirement R-014 says workers must confirm without handling a scanner. Each vendor must prove it with 100 consecutive trial picks.

The gray examples inside the fields show the level of detail expected. They are examples only and are not saved as answers.
Warehouse Workflow Lab

Warehouse vendor comparison worksheet

Published by Voodoo Robotics · workflows.voodoorobotics.com

01

Requirement control

What to do: Give every need a Requirement ID and mark it required, preferred, or a future idea.

This section is a list.Use one row for each task, observation, test, person, field, or requirement. Add more rows when needed.
Requirement IDGive the requirement a unique number.
Workflow / use caseDescribe the exact warehouse job the requirement must support.
PriorityChoose whether this is required now, preferred, or a future idea.
Acceptance testWrite the observable trial that proves this requirement is met.
OwnerName the person responsible for this decision, task, or approval.
02

Vendor response

What to do: Use the Requirement ID to connect every vendor answer to the same need.

This section is a list.Use one row for each task, observation, test, person, field, or requirement. Add more rows when needed.
Requirement IDGive the requirement a unique number.
Vendor / solutionEnter the supplier and exact product or service being evaluated.
Native / configured / customNative needs no change; configured uses settings; custom requires new software or hardware work.
Evidence referenceName the photo, report, scan, system record, or observation that proves the answer.
LimitationWrite one specific fact, concern, or item still needing proof.
DependencyState what must be completed first.
Exception pathDescribe how the vendor solution keeps work identified and recoverable when this requirement fails.
03

Commercial and lifecycle

What to do: Compare one-time and recurring cost plus who is responsible.

04

Scoring

What to do: Use the Requirement ID so each score connects to the original need and proof.

This section is a list.Use one row for each task, observation, test, person, field, or requirement. Add more rows when needed.
Requirement IDGive the requirement a unique number.
CriterionName the single requirement or quality being scored in this row.
WeightEnter this criterion’s share of the total importance. All criterion weights should add to 100%.
Vendor scoreScore 0–5: 0 cannot meet it, 1 is an unproved claim, 3 is demonstrated, and 5 clearly exceeds the need.
Evidence qualityChoose the strongest proof actually supplied for this score.
Risk adjustmentEnter 0 when proof is strong or subtract up to 5 score points for unproved claims or major dependencies.
Weighted resultMultiply the weight percentage by the adjusted vendor score. Example: 20% × (4 − 1) = 0.60.

Keep related photos, drawings, reports, and system records with the saved PDF. This worksheet does not replace site-specific safety, quality, regulatory, or engineering review.

Reviewed byDate
← All practical worksheets